The plan is called Amer­i­ca 2050 and the con­cept is based upon the cre­ation of megac­i­ties. In order for the megac­i­ties con­cept, which is well under­way, to come to fruition, Amer­i­can sub­urbs and rur­al areas must be com­plete­ly depop­u­lat­ed. This process is under­way and the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion is accel­er­at­ing the process.

This will come as a shock to many read­ing this arti­cle because they did not learn of these events from FOX or CNN. How­ev­er, in actu­al­i­ty, the process of mov­ing the Unit­ed States towards a com­plete Agen­da 21 style of total urban­iza­tion has already com­menced and it began near­ly 20 years ago. In the case of total urban­iza­tion, the Unit­ed States is in the process of divid­ing the coun­try into 11 large dense­ly pop­u­lat­ed urban cen­ters. The con­cept, which will be the sub­ject of a future inves­ti­ga­tion, will explore this “end-game” strat­e­gy of the glob­al­ists which will depop­u­late the America’s sub­urbs and and rur­al areas. The con­cept is called megac­i­ties and the frame­work was laid in 1994, when the Unit­ed States became offi­cial par­tic­i­pants in the North Amer­i­can Free Trade Agree­ment (NAFTA), which was a ‘lib­er­al­ized’ trade agree­ment between Cana­da, the U.S. and Mex­i­co. Under NAFTA, farm­ers’ income in all three coun­tries has plum­met­ed and mil­lions of small farm­ers have lost their land, while agribusi­ness cor­po­ra­tions (i.e. large gov­ern­ment sub­si­dized cor­po­rate farms) have reaped huge prof­its. Sub­se­quent­ly, NAFTA has had three dra­mat­ic effects on farm­ers in North Amer­i­ca and all three effects fur­ther the cause dense urban­iza­tion as out­lined in Agen­da 21 documents.

NAFTA Was the Begin­ning of Rur­al Flight In the Unit­ed States

The first notable effect of NAFTA is that it it is cred­it­ed with great­ly accel­er­at­ing ille­gal immi­gra­tion and almost imme­di­ate­ly bank­rupt­ed over three mil­lion farm­ers in north­ern Mex­i­co and this group became the van­guard of mil­lions of Mex­i­cans ille­gal­ly enter­ing the US in search for sub­sis­tence work of any type.

The sec­ond dra­mat­ic impact of NAFTA lies in the fact that it has had cat­a­stroph­ic con­se­quences for U.S. farm­ers as a record num­ber of small farm­ers have lost their farms and have gone through fore­clo­sure while the gov­ern­ment sub­si­dized cor­po­rate farms have thrived. Since NAFTA, the aver­age annu­al growth of the US trade deficit has been 45% high­er. Also since NAFTA took effect, about 170,000 small fam­i­ly farms have gone bank­rupt which rep­re­sents a decline of 21% of fam­i­ly farms in the U.S. The 21% of Amer­i­can small farm­ers who have been bank­rupt­ed since the advent of NAFTA, rep­re­sents a high­er per­cent­age of dis­placed Amer­i­can farm­ers than what is hap­pen­ing with the forced relo­ca­tion of Chi­nese farm­ers to the ghost cities as cov­ered in the first part of this series. And what hap­pens to Amer­i­can small farm­ers who have lost their liveli­hood? They either work on their for­mer com­peti­tors cor­po­rate farms as hired hands, or they relo­cate to urban areas in search of employment.

In a case of “death by a thou­sand cuts”, the Amer­i­can farmer is rapid­ly mov­ing towards extinc­tion. If it is not the EPA enforc­ing its Agen­da 21 wet­lands reg­u­la­tions with dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences on farm­ers, it is the FDA harass­ing farm­ers for pur­su­ing time-hon­ored farm relat­ed indus­tries such as the raw milk indus­try. Con­gress is plot­ting new attacks on the U.S. farmer as I write these words. Even Amish farm­ers have felt the “swat-team wrath of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. Aver­age, every­day Amer­i­cans are being arrest­ed for mere­ly grow­ing their own food. The rela­tion­ship between the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment and the inde­pen­dent Amer­i­can farmer has become so strained that a 17 coun­ty region in north­ern Cal­i­for­nia and south­ern Ore­gon have come togeth­er to try and form a 51st state dubbed the State of Jef­fer­son.

Whether it is Chi­na or the U.S., the Unit­ed Nations Agen­da 21 urban­iza­tion poli­cies are designed for the pur­pose of herd­ing peo­ple into dense urban areas for rea­sons of con­trol and the pri­ma­ry method of con­trol has to do with dom­i­nat­ing food production.

The US Gov­ern­ment Is Gain­ing Con­trol Over All Food

Through the col­lec­tiviza­tion of the food pro­duc­tion, the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment is work­ing towards gain­ing com­plete con­trol over all food in order to con­trol the peo­ple. On an ever increas­ing basis, NAFTA is pro­vid­ing the U.S. gov­ern­ment with the exact same abil­i­ty. There­fore, the third dra­con­ian impact of NAFTA is that it has led to even more nefar­i­ous free trade agree­ments and exec­u­tive orders which led to the loss of con­trol for local com­mu­ni­ties over their own food supply.

Under­ly­ing the World Trade Orga­ni­za­tion, the Free Trade Area of the Amer­i­c­as (FTAA which has now mor­phed into the Orga­ni­za­tion of Amer­i­can States), and the Cen­tral Amer­i­can Free Trade Agree­ment is the phi­los­o­phy that all food (i.e. from basic grains, meat, fruits and veg­eta­bles) should be exclu­sive­ly pro­duced for inter­na­tion­al export. This is a dras­tic depar­ture from the time hon­ored prac­tice where each coun­try pro­duced the major­i­ty of food its cit­i­zens need­ed on local, small farms and only trad­ed in cer­tain prod­ucts that could not be suc­cess­ful­ly grown local­ly. If any­one won­ders where this is head­ed, we only have to look to Africa for the answer. The very first great wave of a NAFTA style of glob­al­iza­tion in agri­cul­ture took place in Africa, Asia, and Latin Amer­i­ca as glob­al cor­po­ra­tions forced local farm­ers to give up local food pro­duc­tion, and shift­ed pro­duc­tion to plan­ta­tions using enslaved Indige­nous and African labor to grow the lux­u­ry crops of cof­fee, sug­ar, bananas, and cocoa for export to the col­o­niz­ing countries.

If the chang­ing nature of food pro­duc­tion in Africa are not enough to raise the lev­el of con­cern for most, per­haps a quick his­to­ry les­son will jolt the more com­pla­cent among you into a state of full awareness.

Josef Stal­in engaged in his own Sovi­et style Holo­caust when, in 1932 and 1933, and esti­mat­ed six to 20 mil­lion peo­ple in the Ukraine died from star­va­tion when Stal­in imple­ment­ed his pre­scrip­tion of “hope and change” poli­cies in order to elim­i­nate the Ukrainian’s desire for becom­ing their own nation-state.

Upon assum­ing pow­er, the Stal­in­ist Com­mu­nist regime rapid­ly nation­al­ized the food indus­try and forced all of the region’s farms into col­lec­tives. Thus, Stalin’s ver­sion of the Holo­caust came to fruition in what his­to­ry has dubbed, the “Holdo­mor,” in which mil­lions per­ished in only a two year peri­od when the Sovi­et gov­ern­ment began to exter­mi­nate the Ukrain­ian pop­u­la­tion by tak­ing con­trol of food and food pro­duc­tion. The large cor­po­rate col­lec­tiviza­tion of food is pre­cise­ly the same thing that is present­ly hap­pen­ing in the Unit­ed States under Obama.

The les­son here is, if the gov­ern­ment con­trols the food, the gov­ern­ment con­trols the people.

Star­va­tion Will Be Used to Enforce the Agen­da 21 Depop­u­la­tion of Rur­al Areas

The use of food by the U.S. gov­ern­ment has been a mat­ter of offi­cial U.S. gov­ern­men­tal covert pol­i­cy since 1974–1975.

In Decem­ber, 1974, the Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil direct­ed by Hen­ry Kissinger com­plet­ed a clas­si­fied study enti­tled, “Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Study Mem­o­ran­dum 200: Impli­ca­tions of World­wide Pop­u­la­tion Growth for U.S. Secu­ri­ty and Over­seas Inter­ests.” The study was based upon the unproven claims that pop­u­la­tion growth in Less­er Devel­oped Coun­tries (LDC) con­sti­tut­ed a seri­ous risk to America’s nation­al security.

In Novem­ber 1975, Pres­i­dent Ford, based upon the tenets of NSSM 200, out­lined a clas­si­fied plan to forcibly reduce pop­u­la­tion growth in LDC coun­tries through birth con­trol, war and famine. Ford’s new nation­al secu­ri­ty advis­er, Brent Scow­croft, in con­junc­tion with CIA Direc­tor, George H. W. Bush, were tasked with imple­ment­ing the plan and the sec­re­taries of state, trea­sury, defense, and agri­cul­ture assist­ed in the imple­men­ta­tion of these insane geno­ci­dal plans.

NSSM 200 for­mal­ly raised the ques­tion, “Would food be con­sid­ered an instru­ment of nation­al pow­er? … Is the U.S. pre­pared to accept food rationing to help peo­ple who can’t/won’t con­trol their pop­u­la­tion growth”? Kissinger has answered these ques­tions when he stat­ed that he was pre­dict­ing a series of con­trived famines, cre­at­ed by manda­to­ry pro­grams and this would make exclu­sive reliance on birth con­trol pro­grams unnec­es­sary in this mod­ern day appli­ca­tion of eugen­ics in a scheme that would allow Hen­ry to have his cake and eat it too in that the world would final­ly be rid of the “use­less eaters!”

Third world pop­u­la­tion con­trol, using food as one of the pri­ma­ry weapons, has long been a mat­ter of offi­cial covert nation­al pol­i­cy and a por­tion of Pres­i­dent Obama’s Exec­u­tive Order (EO 13603), Nation­al Defense Resources Pre­pared­ness is a con­tin­u­a­tion of that pol­i­cy. Only now, the intend­ed tar­get are not the LDC’s but, instead, the Amer­i­can people.

With the stroke of his pen, Oba­ma has total and absolute con­trol over all food where his EO 13603 states:

e) “Food resources” means all com­modi­ties and prod­ucts, (sim­ple, mixed, or com­pound), or com­ple­ments to such com­modi­ties or prod­ucts, that are capa­ble of being ingest­ed by either human beings or ani­mals, irre­spec­tive of oth­er uses to which such com­modi­ties or prod­ucts may be put, at all stages of pro­cess­ing from the raw com­mod­i­ty to the prod­ucts there­of in vendible form for human or ani­mal con­sump­tion. “Food resources” also means potable water pack­aged in com­mer­cial­ly mar­ketable con­tain­ers, all starch­es, sug­ars, veg­etable and ani­mal or marine fats and oils, seed, cot­ton, hemp, and flax fiber, but does not mean any such mate­r­i­al after it los­es its iden­ti­ty as an agri­cul­tur­al com­mod­i­ty or agri­cul­tur­al product.
(f) “Food resource facil­i­ties” means plants, machin­ery, vehi­cles (includ­ing on farm), and oth­er facil­i­ties required for the pro­duc­tion, pro­cess­ing, dis­tri­b­u­tion, and stor­age (includ­ing cold stor­age) of food resources, and for the domes­tic dis­tri­b­u­tion of farm equip­ment and fertilizer…”

NAFTA was mere­ly the open­ing artillery bom­bard­ment against the Amer­i­can farmer and the ulti­mate depop­u­la­tion of rur­al areas. The death of the Amer­i­can farmer will ulti­mate­ly come at the hands of EO 13603 and I believe this will be ful­ly imple­ment­ed when Oba­ma declares mar­tial law.

 

“Thank God That I Do Not Live On a Farm”

Do you think that you and your fam­i­ly are actu­al­ly safe from the rav­ages of depop­u­lat­ing the rur­al areas through eco­nom­ic black­mail and ulti­mate star­va­tion? Think again! Unless you present­ly live in the core inner city and occu­py less than 500 square feet of liv­ing space, the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion, as I write these words, is active­ly plot­ting to get you out of your home and into dense­ly pop­u­lat­ed urban areas and this will be ful­ly exposed in Part Four of this series as the dra­con­ian con­cept of megac­i­ties is ful­ly explored.