How the UN Is Confiscating American Homes and Controlling All Food and Energy

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Dave Hodges, The Common Sense ShowIn times of crises, the gov­ern­ment has proven, time and time again, that it can­not be count­ed on to ade­quate­ly pro­tect the Amer­i­can peo­ple. As the Amer­i­can peo­ple have not pre­pared for the com­ing dark days, they will be vul­ner­a­ble to star­va­tion, dehy­dra­tion, cholera, pan­demics and attacks from resource-defi­cient loot­ers. Will the gov­ern­ment be there to save them? His­to­ry has already answered this ques­tion in the neg­a­tive. Events such as Hur­ri­cane Kat­ri­na, Hur­ri­cane Sandy, L.A. riots, and the Fer­gu­son riots have repeat­ed­ly demon­strat­ed that when trou­ble comes, the Amer­i­can peo­ple will be on their own.

When dis­as­ter strikes, it will take less than 24 hours until gro­cery stores are emp­ty, the util­i­ties are down and neigh­bors begin to prey upon neigh­bors.

Obama Criminalizes Independence

Cer­tain­ly, no gov­ern­ment can be all things to all peo­ple. Sub­se­quent­ly, the gov­ern­ment should be in the busi­ness of encour­ag­ing its cit­i­zens to be inde­pen­dent. How­ev­er, the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion has tak­en the oppo­site approach. Instead of the gov­ern­ment empow­er­ing the peo­ple to be self-suf­fi­cient, this admin­is­tra­tion is pun­ish­ing inde­pen­dence and self suf­fi­cien­cy.

DHS actu­al­ly pub­lished a “Right Wing Extrem­ism Man­u­al which demo­nizes and tar­gets nor­mal cit­i­zens with labels such as “prep­pers” and have fur­ther defined the act of becom­ing self-suf­fi­cient as being the actions of a domes­tic ter­ror­ist. It is iron­ic that DHS is the one who has ordered mil­lions of FEMA cas­kets, 2700 armored per­son­nel car­ri­ers and 2.2 bil­lion rounds of ammu­ni­tion. Yet, it is only the whol­ly inde­pen­dent peo­ple, only desir­ing to be left alone by their gov­ern­ment, (that?) are labeled as domes­tic ter­ror­ists.

America Is Witnessing the Manifestation of Agenda 21

Any aware per­son knows that Agen­da 21 is pred­i­cat­ed on elim­i­nat­ing pri­vate prop­er­ty own­er­ship and keep­ing all peo­ple with­in the “sys­tem”. Drink­ing raw milk, engag­ing in off the grid liv­ing and heat­ing your home with a wood stove is for­bid­den. All of these pro­hi­bi­tions and more are present­ly encir­cling Amer­i­ca as the Agen­da 21 noose is tight­en­ing around col­lec­tive necks.

Many unaware Amer­i­cans still mis­tak­en­ly believe that they have domin­ion over their lives and per­son­al choic­es. These same peo­ple mis­tak­en­ly believe that the gov­ern­ment does not care if you want to live inde­pen­dent­ly of their cor­po­rate cronies  who own the util­i­ties. They want you in their sys­tem so they can con­tin­ue to exploit your resources for their ben­e­fit. Take the case of Robin Sper­o­nis who tried opt­ing for renew­able non-grid tied pow­er and uti­lize envi­ron­men­tal­ly friend­ly com­post­ing toi­lets and his own self-suf­fi­cient water sup­ply. If one com­mits these acts in Flori­da, that per­son could go to jail.

Ipmc-232x300Sper­o­nis lived off the grid, inde­pen­dent of Cape Coral’s (Flori­da)  water and elec­tric util­i­ties. Not to be denied the rev­enue to them owed (by?) the sub­jects of Flori­da, the util­i­ties took Sper­o­nis to court and the judge ruled this off-the-grid liv­ing was ille­gal last week . The judge labeled the Sper­o­nis home as being “unsan­i­tary” and cit­ed the Inter­na­tion­al Prop­er­ty Main­te­nance Code in the rul­ing.  Wikipedia fur­ther  expos­es the fact that the Inter­na­tion­al Prop­er­ty Main­te­nance Code derives its author­i­ty from Agen­da 21 and ICLEI and that this “reg­u­la­tion” boot­straps its author­i­ty into the fol­low­ing domains.

Inter­na­tion­al Build­ing Code
Inter­na­tion­al Res­i­den­tial Code
Inter­na­tion­al Fire Code
Inter­na­tion­al Plumb­ing Code
Inter­na­tion­al Mechan­i­cal Code
Inter­na­tion­al Wild­land Urban Inter­face Code
Inter­na­tion­al Exist­ing Build­ing Code
Inter­na­tion­al Prop­er­ty Main­te­nance Code
Inter­na­tion­al Pri­vate Sewage Dis­pos­al Code
Inter­na­tion­al Zon­ing Code
Inter­na­tion­al Green Con­struc­tion Code…

Sub­se­quent­ly, we have an Amer­i­can judge, in Flori­da, cit­ing UN man­date to forcibly evict an Amer­i­can cit­i­zen of(f?) their prop­er­ty and nul­li­fy their Fifth Amend­ment Rights. Sper­o­nis also faces jail time for non­com­pli­ance with inter­na­tion­al law.

If you read noth­ing else in this arti­cle, I strong­ly sug­gest you heed this warn­ing. In two years, local and state gov­ern­ments will have the abil­i­ty to begin to seize indi­vid­ual prop­er­ty for the fail­ure to meet code, usu­al­ly in the area of ener­gy effi­cien­cy and inter­na­tion­al code com­pli­ance. In the near future if one can­not meet the bur­den of upgrad­ing their old­er homes into meet­ing the stan­dards relat­ed ener­gy com­pli­ance, by Unit­ed Nations stan­dards, one could have their home con­fis­cat­ed with­out any com­pen­sa­tion.

More Agenda 21 Insanity

The lat­est round of Agen­da 21 insan­i­ty is com­ing from the Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency (EPA). The EPA has recent­ly imposed new heat­ing rules as of last year and the date of enforce­ment has (at?) long last arrived.

wood-stoveThe insane appli­ca­tion of Agen­da 21 poli­cies knows no bounds when it comes to the EPA. Also under the aus­pices of the Inter­na­tion­al Prop­er­ty Main­te­nance Code, the EPA has intro­duced new stan­dards for wood stoves which dra­mat­i­cal­ly reduces the amount of fine par­ti­cle emis­sions for any wood stove sold in 2015. The emis­sions must be reduced by 33% with more reduc­tions sched­uled for 2019.

At issue is the unsub­stan­ti­at­ed claim that the EPA is mak­ing that if the use of wood stoves are (is) reduced, the health of the res­i­dents will increase. Yet, the EPA does not offer any peer-reviewed research, which has been repli­cat­ed, as proof of this bogus claim. Are we just sup­posed to take their word for it? We might as well face the fact that the EPA is con­trolled by ICLEI and their Unit­ed Nations pup­pet mas­ters.

Who Are the Real Terrorists?

We are under attack from the skies and through the poi­son­ing of our air through mas­sive chem­i­cal spray­ing com­plete with Alzheimer’s and demen­tia caus­ing alu­minum sul­fate and can­cer caus­ing bar­i­umFukushi­ma radi­a­tionCorex­it spray­ing and the result­ing tox­ic rain from the Gulf oil spill is run­ning ram­pant over our coun­try and not one ounce of main­stream media cov­er­age is afford­ed to these dan­gers. Pre­ven­tion and reme­di­a­tion from these dan­gers, caused by gov­ern­men­tal indif­fer­ence or com­plic­i­ty, are not put into place by our present gov­ern­ment.

Our water is being sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly removed from the coun­try by Nes­tle, and our water tables are being sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly com­pro­mised by envi­ron­men­tal tox­ins and of course many Amer­i­cans are con­sum­ing water per­me­at­ed with IQ-low­er­ing rock­et fuel (i.e. flu­o­ride).

Amer­i­cans are now in the midst of being sub­ject­ed to the death pan­els of Oba­ma care in which cit­i­zens over the age of 70 are offi­cial­ly referred to as “units” and are tar­get­ed for com­fort care but not giv­en life sav­ing mea­sures. Under these con­di­tions is it real­ly in our best inter­est to remain “in the sys­tem”?

This is an unde­ni­able, unmit­i­gat­ed and naked ver­sion of Eugen­ics cast in the same fla­vor as that prac­ticed by Mar­garet Sanger, Joseph Stal­in and Adolph Hitler and when Amer­i­cans try to extri­cate them­selves from these assaults upon their lib­er­ties and their health, they are increas­ing­ly mar­gin­al­ized, and pros­e­cut­ed.

Conclusion

Who’s the real ter­ror­ist here? Why is the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion embrac­ing inter­na­tion­al man­dates which crim­i­nal­izes inde­pen­dent behav­ior and choic­es in vio­la­tion of our Fifth Amend­ment rights?

If you have the courage to real­ly answer these ques­tions, I would sug­gest you dig into world his­to­ry and read about the Holodomor  and dis­cov­er the real moti­va­tion behind forced com­pli­ance which results in total depen­dence on the gov­ern­ment for life-sus­tain­ing ser­vices should become read­i­ly appar­ent.