Civilization Rights

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Busi­ness ceas­es to become busi­ness when it becomes engaged in polit­i­cal deci­sion mak­ing regard­less of whether the deci­sions con­cern for­eign or domes­tic pol­i­cy. It becomes a fifth col­umn that seeks absolute con­trol. A per­son would have to be com­plete­ly brain dead not to see that this is what has hap­pened to the Unit­ed States. It’s being run by a fifth col­umn that is not even Amer­i­can.

The U.S. was set on this course by Franklin Delano Roo­sevelt and Har­ry Tru­man with the cre­ation of the Unit­ed Nations (1945) and then the Mar­shall Plan (1948) that was autho­rized by the Con­gress under the name Euro­pean Recov­ery pro­gram. The objec­tive was to pro­vide assis­tance to rebuild Europe – sup­pos­ed­ly. What it actu­al­ly turns out to have been was the con­tin­u­a­tion of war fought on a dif­fer­ent bat­tle­field with­in a dif­fer­ent con­text – but it was still war for dom­i­na­tion and con­trol. It is war with­out a moral foun­da­tion and the strate­gists have no alle­giance to our coun­try, our peo­ple, our his­to­ry, cul­ture or her­itage.

On Jan­u­ary 21, 2015, the Sen­ate For­eign Rela­tions held a hear­ing on nation­al secu­ri­ty threats. Two for­mer Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Advi­sors, Brent Scow­croft and Zbig­niew Brzezin­s­ki tes­ti­fied. The video below is an excerpt of the tes­ti­mo­ny giv­en by Brent Scow­croft. He did define the prob­lem but he skipped over the era of the Mar­shall Plan going right from cre­ation of the Unit­ed Nations to glob­al­iza­tion in the mod­ern con­text.  Why he did that will become appar­ent below but aside from that, what he had to say was impor­tant to hear.

[/su_youtube]

The West­phalian sys­tem of nation-states was the result of a peace treaty signed in 1648 among Euro­pean mon­archs and the Holy Roman Emper­or. It was an agree­ment to estab­lish and rec­og­nize dis­tinct juris­dic­tions bound­ed geo­graph­i­cal­ly as inde­pen­dent and sov­er­eign ter­ri­to­ries which we call states (nation-states).

When Brent Scow­croft said, “We have been at the fore­front in lib­er­al­iz­ing the West­phalian sys­tem in mak­ing a more just world for all”, what he was talk­ing about was glob­al “gov­er­nance” with the Unit­ed Nations at the cen­ter. They entan­gled us in the attack on sov­er­eign­ty behind the cov­er of the Mar­shall Plan for eco­nom­ic recov­ery of Europe fol­low­ing World War II. In the ear­ly years, this was a covert oper­a­tion of the U.S. State Depart­ment known to us now through declas­si­fied U.S. State Depart­ment doc­u­ments found in the files of Clark Clif­ford. Top_Secret-300x183I will go into more detail on this in sub­se­quent writ­ings, but for the moment, this brief overview will have to suf­fice.

Josef Retinger, a pol­ish ex-pat liv­ing in Lon­don was the coor­di­na­tor of the meet­ings of the gov­ern­ments in exile dur­ing World War II.  Fol­low­ing the war, Retinger’s objec­tive was to cre­ate a Unit­ed States of Europe.  Toward that end, he approached Prince Bern­hard of the Nether­lands with the sug­ges­tion reg­u­lar infor­mal meet­ings among pow­er bro­kers.  Their first meet­ing was at the Bilder­berg Hotel Oost­er­beek Hol­land in 1954.  The peo­ple who attend the meet­ings which are still going on to this day, have been dubbed The Bilder­berg Group.

The rea­son for bring­ing up the Bilder­berg Group is because U.S. Sen­a­tor Jacob Jav­its attend­ed a Bilder­berg Group meet­ing in Williams­burg, VA in 1964 and he placed into the Con­gres­sion­al Record, infor­ma­tion about the group.  The fol­low­ing is the loca­tion in the record:  Con­gres­sion­al Record, Vol­ume 110, Part 6, April 11, 1964, pp. 7684–7685.  The most impor­tant part of the report from my point of view is the list of atten­dees:  among which are the fol­low­ing:

  • Con­gress­man Ger­ald Ford
  • Chris­t­ian A. Hert­er, For­mer Sec­re­tary of State, Spe­cial Trade Rep­re­sen­ta­tive for Trade nego­ti­a­tions
  • Hen­ry (Scoop) Jack­son
  • Jacob Jav­its
  • Hen­ry Kissinger
  • Gio­van­ni Agnel­li, Vice-Chair­man, Fiat Co. Italy
  • McGe­orge Bundy
  • Emilio G. Col­la­do, Vice Pres­i­dent, Stan­dard Oil, NJ
  • Aurel­lio Pec­cei, Direc­tor, Ital-Con­sult (for­mer­ly of Fiat)
  • David Rock­e­feller
  • Dirk Stikker, Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al of NATO
  • Wal­ter Wris­ton, Exec­u­tive VP, First Nation­al City Bank (Citibank)
  • Eric Wyn­d­ham White KCMG, Exec­u­tive Sec­re­tary, GATT, Inter­na­tion­al

From those names on the list – plus loads of oth­er research, it’s a sim­ple mat­ter of deduc­tion that the strat­e­gy for “soft­en­ing sov­er­eign­ty” as Brent Scow­croft dubbed it, was through agree­ments that were decep­tive­ly pre­sent­ed to the pub­lic as trade agree­ments suc­ces­sive­ly build­ing one on top of the oth­er over time to form what is again a decep­tion in label­ing, a com­mon mar­ket which ulti­mate­ly is replaced by a con­sti­tu­tion as in Europe which cre­at­ed the Euro­pean Union.  (Note: which is also why the peo­ple who are call­ing for a con­sti­tu­tion­al con­ven­tion should not be trust­ed).  Suc­cinct­ly, the “free trade” agree­ments were nev­er about trade, they were about break­ing Amer­i­can sov­er­eign­ty to make way for a com­mon mar­ket and ulti­mate­ly, a North Amer­i­can Union.

Now I have to give you some dri­ve-by his­to­ry because I’m learn­ing as I’m going –

Empires

The evo­lu­tion of gov­ern­ments in Europe and Asia began as reli­gious insti­tu­tions that con­trolled ter­ri­to­ry.

The fol­low­ing is a pic­ture of the Ottoman Empire.  The Ottoman Empire was and is Mus­lim.  At its peak, it was ruled by a Caliph or Imam with the dis­tinc­tion being based on tribe or sect (not sure which).  Regard­less, the leader of the empire was also the reli­gious leader.Ottoman_Empire_16831-300x231
This pic­ture is of the Holy Roman Empire.  The names of the coun­tries print­ed on the map were added for per­spec­tive but were not formed as coun­tries per se at the time.

The juris­dic­tions of the HRE were ruled by Kings, Emper­ors and Princes.  Some of the juris­dic­tions were “free impe­r­i­al cities”.  The head of the Holy Roman Empire was obvi­ous­ly the Pope of the Catholic Church.Holy_Roman_Empire-300x244The image below is of the British Empire that was recon­sti­tut­ed as vol­un­tary mem­bers of the Com­mon­wealth of Nations which is com­prised of for­mer British Domin­ions and Colonies.   The Com­mon­wealth was estab­lished in 1949.  A map of the Com­mon­wealth was as close as I could find to a map of the empire but it wouldn’t be accu­rate of the rough­ly 1650 time­frame of the oth­er maps.  For one thing, the east coast of the Unit­ed States would be on the British Empire map.

The fol­low­ing is a rough list of the events that caused Britain to break away from the Holy Roman Empire and to estab­lish the Church of Eng­land (i.e. Angli­can Church).

1529: Hen­ry VIII accepts the Protes­tant Ref­or­ma­tion

1533: Hen­ry VIII mar­ries Anne Boleyn and is excom­mu­ni­cat­ed by Pope Clement VII

1534: Hen­ry VIII declares him­self supreme head of the Church of Eng­land

1553: Mary I, daugh­ter of Hen­ry VIII and Cather­ine of Aragon, becomes queen of Eng­land and returns Eng­land to Catholi­cism, while hun­dreds of Protes­tants are burned at the stakes

1558: Eliz­a­beth I, daugh­ter of Hen­ry VIII and Anne Boleyn, becomes queen of Eng­land and Eng­land becomes Protes­tant again and Catholics are per­se­cut­ed

1563: The Angli­can Church is offi­cial­ly found­ed (on pre­des­ti­na­tion and the redeem­ing pow­er of faith alone)

To this day, the Queen of Eng­land (British Monarch) is the Supreme Gov­er­nor of the Church of England…Defender of the Faith.   Some­what face­tious­ly, one might even say that she’s the Popette of the Great Britain and the Com­mon­wealth of Nations.

Free Trade

Free Trade

By the late 1950’s, the busi­ness of the Mar­shall Plan – rebuild­ing Europe while sub­vert­ing their sov­er­eign­ty to form the Euro­pean Union (empire) was basi­cal­ly fin­ished – or at least could no longer be jus­ti­fied.  Begin­ning in the ear­ly 1960’s, they began to use the ter­me­co­nom­ic devel­op­ment rather than rebuild­ing and they began using trade agree­ments to nego­ti­ate non-tar­iff relat­ed changes that impact­ed our domes­tic law and econ­o­my.

The first trade round com­plet­ed under this new cov­er sto­ry was the Kennedy Round that was for Oper­a­tion Pan Amer­i­ca known to the pub­lic as the Alliance for Progress to the pub­lic.   What was unknown at the time, was that the real pur­pose and real objec­tive was to under­mine the sov­er­eign­ty of the Unit­ed States and Latin Amer­i­can for the pur­pose of cre­ation of the Free Trade Area of the Amer­i­c­as an empire by a con­tract (inter­na­tion­al law by agree­ment) or as I’ve called it oth­er places, Empire of the Black Robes.

It’s safe to say that this plan was a con­spir­a­cy car­ried out by lead­ers of the world with­out the knowl­edge or con­sent of the affect­ed pop­u­la­tions, the point of which is to say that lead­ers of the Mid­dle East­ern coun­tries knew or learned of the plan at some point.  Knowl­edge of the plan for a Mid­dle East­ern Free Trade Area (MEFTA) revived the dreams of restora­tion of the Ottoman Empire because the options were to be sub­ju­gat­ed under west­ern law in the Empire of the Black Robes or to be ruled as they had been tra­di­tion­al­ly ruled, by a reli­gious leader – a Caliph or Imam.

The big­ger prob­lem is that Islam is a nation with­out a state.  It’s a reli­gion and a polit­i­cal move­ment com­bined.   When some of the lead­ers of Islam­ic coun­ties called for a glob­al jihad (holy war), all Mus­lims are oblig­at­ed under Islam­ic law to answer the call.

On Jan­u­ary 24, 2015, Newt Gin­grich spoke at the Iowa Free­dom Sum­mit.   It was the first time I’ve heard an Amer­i­can leader speak with enough clar­i­ty that the lis­ten­er can actu­al­ly make sense of what’s going on in our coun­try.   The entire speech can be heard on C-Span but the video below has the sig­nif­i­cant excerpts.

youtube
please spec­i­fy cor­rect url
The inten­tion­al break­ing down of the West­phalian nation-state sys­tem to cre­ate a glob­al sys­tem of free move­ment of goods, ser­vices and peo­ple across bor­ders has opened us up for a slow-walk­ing inva­sion by Mus­lims who have glob­al jihad in their minds.  Even if full-blown war doesn’t break out, they will sim­ply over­whelm us unless we rise to break this sov­er­eign­ty-destroy­ing inter­na­tion­al sys­tem of “free trade” under the WTO.  In the mean time, we can­not allow Mus­lims to use our own legal sys­tem against us.  When they say “civ­il rights”… we say NO… “civ­i­liza­tion rights” and mean it because the future of our coun­try depends on it.