United Nations’ (U.N.) connection to Agenda 21 and sustainability and how it directly affects property owners.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Secure ArkansasSecure Arkansas spoke to the Asso­ci­a­tion of Arkansas Coun­ties for their Annu­al Con­fer­ence held August 20 – 22, 2014 in Lit­tle Rock, Arkansas.


Jeannie Burlsworth

Jean­nie Burlsworth

Jean­nie Burlsworth, Founder / Chair of Secure Arkansas, began by explain­ing Unit­ed Nations’ (U.N.) con­nec­tion to Agen­da 21 and sus­tain­abil­i­ty and how it direct­ly affects prop­er­ty own­ers. She men­tioned the EPA, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, rede­f­i­n­i­tion of U.S. “Nav­i­ga­ble” Waters, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engi­neers’ 404 Per­mits. Jack Abra­ham­son, State Coor­di­na­tor for Secure Arkansas, addressed the Crit­i­cal Habi­tat issue. We’ll cov­er his infor­ma­tion in a follow-up.

Click here to read about the cre­ation of EPA and its his­to­ry (http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/oi.nsf/Sustainability/History). This is direct­ly from the EPA web­site and gives you some of the his­to­ry of sus­tain­abil­i­ty and U.N. Agen­da 21, as well as the EPA’s con­nec­tion to the Unit­ed Nations. It is no coin­ci­dence that after the cre­ation of EPA, the U.S. was region­al­ized. If you still think it’s con­spir­a­cy the­o­ry, you’re sim­ply in the dark. Some of you may not have heard of U.N. Agen­da 21 before. Ven­ture no fur­ther than (the web­page above) from the EPA, about which every coun­ty judge/ coun­ty com­mis­sion­er and res­i­dent of any state should be aware. Please print it off (it’s only 4 pages), and dis­trib­ute it to your local coun­ty elect­ed offi­cials. This involves the RESTRUCTURING of GOVERNMENT.

From the EPA web­site itself:

Nixon sub­mit­ted to Con­gress a reor­ga­ni­za­tion plan propos­ing the estab­lish­ment of a U.S. Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency as an inde­pen­dent agency in the exec­u­tive branch of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. [Bold empha­sis, Secure Arkansas’] 

It goes on to address this top­ic we’ve cov­ered many times before:

Agen­da 21
The Earth Sum­mit was larg­er not only in the lev­el of par­tic­i­pa­tion by the nations of the world, but also in the scope of issues it sought to address. Over 100 heads of state and gov­ern­ment attend­ed the Earth Sum­mit and 170 nations sent del­e­ga­tions. As part of the Earth Sum­mit, nation­al lead­ers had an oppor­tu­ni­ty to sign inter­na­tion­al con­ven­tions on cli­mate change and bio­di­ver­si­ty, a “Dec­la­ra­tion of Envi­ron­ment and Devel­op­ment” and an Agen­da for the 21st Cen­tu­ry (a.k.a. Agen­da 21), which sought to estab­lish a con­cert­ed effort to edu­cate peo­ple about the state of both envi­ron­ment and devel­op­ment, and to assist them to make deci­sions that lead to sustainability.

Sec­re­tary Gen­er­al of UNCED, Mau­rice Strong, sum­ma­rized Agen­da 21 as, a “pro­gram of action for a sus­tain­able future for the human fam­i­ly and a first step towards ensur­ing that the world will become a more just, secure and pros­per­ous habi­tat for all humanity.”

Agen­da 21 called on all coun­tries of the world to under­take a com­pre­hen­sive process of plan­ning and action to attain sus­tain­abil­i­ty. In addi­tion to glob­al agen­da, this doc­u­ment also detailed a role for cities and coun­ties. Chap­ter 28 of Agen­da 21 (known as Local Agen­da 21) states: “Local author­i­ties con­struct, oper­ate and main­tain eco­nom­ic, social and envi­ron­men­tal infra­struc­ture, over­see plan­ning process­es, estab­lish local envi­ron­men­tal poli­cies and reg­u­la­tions, and …as the lev­el of gov­ern­ment clos­est to the peo­ple, they play a vital role in edu­cat­ing, mobi­liz­ing and respond­ing to the pub­lic to pro­mote sus­tain­able devel­op­ment.” [High­light and bold empha­sis, Secure Arkansas’] 

Local author­i­ties will be MADE to com­ply with their agen­da. This is the glob­al-to-local plan for local offi­cials to come into com­pli­ance with Unit­ed Nations Agen­da 21 poli­cies and reg­u­la­tions. (Just to be clear – this is imple­ment­ing the demise of Amer­i­ca, coun­ty-by-coun­ty, and bring­ing each coun­ty into com­pli­ance. Secure Arkansas DOES NOT SUPPORT U.N. Agen­da 21!) Are you, coun­ty offi­cial, aware of the poli­cies and reg­u­la­tions with which you’ll be made to com­ply? Are you, as a coun­ty offi­cial, pro­mot­ing Sus­tain­able Development?

Scroll down, and you’ll also see this on their page:

President’s Coun­cil on Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment (PCSD)
On the anniver­sary of the Earth Sum­mit in June 1993, Pres­i­dent Clin­ton signed an exec­u­tive order estab­lish­ing the President’s Coun­cil on Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment (PCSD)…

The 25 mem­ber Coun­cil built new part­ner­ships among rep­re­sen­ta­tives from indus­try, gov­ern­ment (includ­ing U.S. Cab­i­net mem­bers) and envi­ron­men­tal, labor, and civ­il rights orga­ni­za­tions in order to devel­op bold new approach­es to inte­grate eco­nom­ic and envi­ron­men­tal poli­cies. Their charge: to trans­form the President’s vision of sus­tain­able devel­op­ment into a con­crete plan of action. Their ini­tial work con­clud­ed in Feb­ru­ary 1996, with the pub­lish­ing of their report enti­tled, “Sus­tain­able Amer­i­ca: A New Con­sen­sus for Pros­per­i­ty, Oppor­tu­ni­ty, and A Healthy Envi­ron­ment for the Future.” [Bold empha­sis, Secure Arkansas’] 

In our under­stand­ing, U.N. Agen­da 21 is a mas­ter blue­print of rules, reg­u­la­tions, and guide­lines clear down to the local lev­el that would imple­ment and con­struct manda­to­ry sus­tain­able (green) com­mu­ni­ties. Secure Arkansas DOES NOT pro­mote this! In the same year that Pres­i­dent Clin­ton estab­lished the Pres­i­den­tial Coun­cil on Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment, Inter­na­tion­al Code Coun­cils were imple­ment­ed. This code has devel­oped a large num­ber of inter­na­tion­al codes which were intend­ed to replace build­ing codes (and oth­er codes) all over the U.S. Code vio­la­tions can often be used as a rea­son to fine or imprison peo­ple or prop­er­ty own­ers, and even LEGALLY STEAL pri­vate property.

U.N. Agen­da 21 is an action plan to inven­to­ry and con­trol all land, all water, all plants and ani­mals, agri­cul­ture, con­struc­tion, and all ener­gy, includ­ing you – each liv­ing soul. This is nowhere close to con­sti­tu­tion­al gov­ern­ment. It’s a Marx­ist / Com­mu­nist agenda.

COUNTY OFFICIALS: don’t let this dic­ta­to­r­i­al Agen­da 21 be forced on you and your county!

Oth­er issues Secure Arkansas men­tioned at the Asso­ci­a­tion of Arkansas Coun­ties Con­ven­tion are: the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the attempt­ed rede­f­i­n­i­tion of U.S. “Nav­i­ga­ble” Waters, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engi­neers’ 404 Per­mits. (Reminder: This is what the U.S. Army Corps of Engi­neers is say­ing about the 404 Per­mit processReg­u­la­to­ry_­mod­ule_­text-only. We believe these per­mits will be detri­men­tal to all, and that life and busi­ness as we know it will become increas­ing­ly com­pli­cat­ed and cost­ly. This guide cit­i­zens-guide-to-the-corp has a sec­tion dis­cussing the Corps of Engi­neers’ 404 Per­mits. We’ve also includ­ed the Corps’ doc­u­ment itself regard­ing 404 per­mits Dar­d­en USACE process, since many of you have been wait­ing for that infor­ma­tion.) We’ll do a sep­a­rate email regard­ing 404 Per­mits; it’s too com­pli­cat­ed to include here.

Last­ly, read this arti­cle  and watch the includ­ed video 

 about U.S. Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Scott Tipton’s ques­tions to the EPA about a con­tro­ver­sial new rule which could rede­fine “Waters of the Unit­ed States” under the Clean Water Act. Con­gress­man Tip­ton men­tions the prob­lems with Blue­way as he ques­tions EPA Deputy Admin­is­tra­tor Bob Per­ci­asepe! We need to tell our U.S. Con­gress­men to please DEFUND the EPA.

To be continued…