The Agenda 21 Depopulation of Rural Areas Will Give Obama Stalin-Like Control Over Food

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Dave Hodges

The “Hunger Games” nightmare scenario presently being implemented and it is called America 2050.

The “Hunger Games” night­mare sce­nario present­ly being imple­ment­ed and it is called Amer­i­ca 2050.

The plan is called Amer­i­ca 2050 and the con­cept is based upon the cre­ation of megac­i­ties. In order for the megac­i­ties con­cept, which is well under­way, to come to fruition, Amer­i­can sub­urbs and rur­al areas must be com­plete­ly depop­u­lat­ed. This process is under­way and the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion is accel­er­at­ing the process.

This will come as a shock to many read­ing this arti­cle because they did not learn of these events from FOX or CNN. How­ev­er, in actu­al­i­ty, the process of mov­ing the Unit­ed States towards a com­plete Agen­da 21 style of total urban­iza­tion has already com­menced and it began near­ly 20 years ago. In the case of total urban­iza­tion, the Unit­ed States is in the process of divid­ing the coun­try into 11 large dense­ly pop­u­lat­ed urban cen­ters. The con­cept, which will be the sub­ject of a future inves­ti­ga­tion, will explore this “end-game” strat­e­gy of the glob­al­ists which will depop­u­late the America’s sub­urbs and and rur­al areas. The con­cept is called megac­i­ties and the frame­work was laid in 1994, when the Unit­ed States became offi­cial par­tic­i­pants in the North Amer­i­can Free Trade Agree­ment (NAFTA), which was a ‘lib­er­al­ized’ trade agree­ment between Cana­da, the U.S. and Mex­i­co. Under NAFTA, farm­ers’ income in all three coun­tries has plum­met­ed and mil­lions of small farm­ers have lost their land, while agribusi­ness cor­po­ra­tions (i.e. large gov­ern­ment sub­si­dized cor­po­rate farms) have reaped huge prof­its. Sub­se­quent­ly, NAFTA has had three dra­mat­ic effects on farm­ers in North Amer­i­ca and all three effects fur­ther the cause dense urban­iza­tion as out­lined in Agen­da 21 doc­u­ments.

NAFTA Was the Begin­ning of Rur­al Flight In the Unit­ed States

The first notable effect of NAFTA is that it it is cred­it­ed with great­ly accel­er­at­ing ille­gal immi­gra­tion and almost imme­di­ate­ly bank­rupt­ed over three mil­lion farm­ers in north­ern Mex­i­co and this group became the van­guard of mil­lions of Mex­i­cans ille­gal­ly enter­ing the US in search for sub­sis­tence work of any type.

The sec­ond dra­mat­ic impact of NAFTA lies in the fact that it has had cat­a­stroph­ic con­se­quences for U.S. farm­ers as a record num­ber of small farm­ers have lost their farms and have gone through fore­clo­sure while the gov­ern­ment sub­si­dized cor­po­rate farms have thrived. Since NAFTA, the aver­age annu­al growth of the US trade deficit has been 45% high­er. Also since NAFTA took effect, about 170,000 small fam­i­ly farms have gone bank­rupt which rep­re­sents a decline of 21% of fam­i­ly farms in the U.S. The 21% of Amer­i­can small farm­ers who have been bank­rupt­ed since the advent of NAFTA, rep­re­sents a high­er per­cent­age of dis­placed Amer­i­can farm­ers than what is hap­pen­ing with the forced relo­ca­tion of Chi­nese farm­ers to the ghost cities as cov­ered in the first part of this series. And what hap­pens to Amer­i­can small farm­ers who have lost their liveli­hood? They either work on their for­mer com­peti­tors cor­po­rate farms as hired hands, or they relo­cate to urban areas in search of employ­ment.

In a case of “death by a thou­sand cuts”, the Amer­i­can farmer is rapid­ly mov­ing towards extinc­tion. If it is not the EPA enforc­ing its Agen­da 21 wet­lands reg­u­la­tions with dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences on farm­ers, it is the FDA harass­ing farm­ers for pur­su­ing time-hon­ored farm relat­ed indus­tries such as the raw milk indus­try. Con­gress is plot­ting new attacks on the U.S. farmer as I write these words. Even Amish farm­ers have felt the “swat-team wrath of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. Aver­age, every­day Amer­i­cans are being arrest­ed for mere­ly grow­ing their own food. The rela­tion­ship between the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment and the inde­pen­dent Amer­i­can farmer has become so strained that a 17 coun­ty region in north­ern Cal­i­for­nia and south­ern Ore­gon have come togeth­er to try and form a 51st state dubbed the State of Jef­fer­son.

The push-back against Agenda 21 tyranny.

The push-back against Agen­da 21 tyran­ny.

Whether it is Chi­na or the U.S., the Unit­ed Nations Agen­da 21 urban­iza­tion poli­cies are designed for the pur­pose of herd­ing peo­ple into dense urban areas for rea­sons of con­trol and the pri­ma­ry method of con­trol has to do with dom­i­nat­ing food pro­duc­tion.

The US Gov­ern­ment Is Gain­ing Con­trol Over All Food

Through the col­lec­tiviza­tion of the food pro­duc­tion, the Chi­nese gov­ern­ment is work­ing towards gain­ing com­plete con­trol over all food in order to con­trol the peo­ple. On an ever increas­ing basis, NAFTA is pro­vid­ing the U.S. gov­ern­ment with the exact same abil­i­ty. There­fore, the third dra­con­ian impact of NAFTA is that it has led to even more nefar­i­ous free trade agree­ments and exec­u­tive orders which led to the loss of con­trol for local com­mu­ni­ties over their own food sup­ply.

Under­ly­ing the World Trade Orga­ni­za­tion, the Free Trade Area of the Amer­i­c­as (FTAA which has now mor­phed into the Orga­ni­za­tion of Amer­i­can States), and the Cen­tral Amer­i­can Free Trade Agree­ment is the phi­los­o­phy that all food (i.e. from basic grains, meat, fruits and veg­eta­bles) should be exclu­sive­ly pro­duced for inter­na­tion­al export. This is a dras­tic depar­ture from the time hon­ored prac­tice where each coun­try pro­duced the major­i­ty of food its cit­i­zens need­ed on local, small farms and only trad­ed in cer­tain prod­ucts that could not be suc­cess­ful­ly grown local­ly. If any­one won­ders where this is head­ed, we only have to look to Africa for the answer. The very first great wave of a NAFTA style of glob­al­iza­tion in agri­cul­ture took place in Africa, Asia, and Latin Amer­i­ca as glob­al cor­po­ra­tions forced local farm­ers to give up local food pro­duc­tion, and shift­ed pro­duc­tion to plan­ta­tions using enslaved Indige­nous and African labor to grow the lux­u­ry crops of cof­fee, sug­ar, bananas, and cocoa for export to the col­o­niz­ing coun­tries.

If the chang­ing nature of food pro­duc­tion in Africa are not enough to raise the lev­el of con­cern for most, per­haps a quick his­to­ry les­son will jolt the more com­pla­cent among you into a state of full aware­ness.

Josef Stal­in engaged in his own Sovi­et style Holo­caust when, in 1932 and 1933, and esti­mat­ed six to 20 mil­lion peo­ple in the Ukraine died from star­va­tion when Stal­in imple­ment­ed his pre­scrip­tion of “hope and change” poli­cies in order to elim­i­nate the Ukrainian’s desire for becom­ing their own nation-state.

Upon assum­ing pow­er, the Stal­in­ist Com­mu­nist regime rapid­ly nation­al­ized the food indus­try and forced all of the region’s farms into col­lec­tives. Thus, Stalin’s ver­sion of the Holo­caust came to fruition in what his­to­ry has dubbed, the “Holdo­mor,” in which mil­lions per­ished in only a two year peri­od when the Sovi­et gov­ern­ment began to exter­mi­nate the Ukrain­ian pop­u­la­tion by tak­ing con­trol of food and food pro­duc­tion. The large cor­po­rate col­lec­tiviza­tion of food is pre­cise­ly the same thing that is present­ly hap­pen­ing in the Unit­ed States under Oba­ma.

The les­son here is, if the gov­ern­ment con­trols the food, the gov­ern­ment con­trols the peo­ple.

Star­va­tion Will Be Used to Enforce the Agen­da 21 Depop­u­la­tion of Rur­al Areas

The use of food by the U.S. gov­ern­ment has been a mat­ter of offi­cial U.S. gov­ern­men­tal covert pol­i­cy since 1974–1975.

In Decem­ber, 1974, the Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Coun­cil direct­ed by Hen­ry Kissinger com­plet­ed a clas­si­fied study enti­tled, “Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Study Mem­o­ran­dum 200: Impli­ca­tions of World­wide Pop­u­la­tion Growth for U.S. Secu­ri­ty and Over­seas Inter­ests.” The study was based upon the unproven claims that pop­u­la­tion growth in Less­er Devel­oped Coun­tries (LDC) con­sti­tut­ed a seri­ous risk to America’s nation­al secu­ri­ty.

In Novem­ber 1975, Pres­i­dent Ford, based upon the tenets of NSSM 200, out­lined a clas­si­fied plan to forcibly reduce pop­u­la­tion growth in LDC coun­tries through birth con­trol, war and famine. Ford’s new nation­al secu­ri­ty advis­er, Brent Scow­croft, in con­junc­tion with CIA Direc­tor, George H. W. Bush, were tasked with imple­ment­ing the plan and the sec­re­taries of state, trea­sury, defense, and agri­cul­ture assist­ed in the imple­men­ta­tion of these insane geno­ci­dal plans.

Kissinger’s quote is important because he was tasked with implementing the insane genocidal policies contained in NSSM 200.

Kissinger’s quote is impor­tant because he was tasked with imple­ment­ing the insane geno­ci­dal poli­cies con­tained in NSSM 200.

NSSM 200 for­mal­ly raised the ques­tion, “Would food be con­sid­ered an instru­ment of nation­al pow­er? … Is the U.S. pre­pared to accept food rationing to help peo­ple who can’t/won’t con­trol their pop­u­la­tion growth”? Kissinger has answered these ques­tions when he stat­ed that he was pre­dict­ing a series of con­trived famines, cre­at­ed by manda­to­ry pro­grams and this would make exclu­sive reliance on birth con­trol pro­grams unnec­es­sary in this mod­ern day appli­ca­tion of eugen­ics in a scheme that would allow Hen­ry to have his cake and eat it too in that the world would final­ly be rid of the “use­less eaters!”

Third world pop­u­la­tion con­trol, using food as one of the pri­ma­ry weapons, has long been a mat­ter of offi­cial covert nation­al pol­i­cy and a por­tion of Pres­i­dent Obama’s Exec­u­tive Order (EO 13603), Nation­al Defense Resources Pre­pared­ness is a con­tin­u­a­tion of that pol­i­cy. Only now, the intend­ed tar­get are not the LDC’s but, instead, the Amer­i­can peo­ple.

With the stroke of his pen, Oba­ma has total and absolute con­trol over all food where his EO 13603 states:

e) “Food resources” means all com­modi­ties and prod­ucts, (sim­ple, mixed, or com­pound), or com­ple­ments to such com­modi­ties or prod­ucts, that are capa­ble of being ingest­ed by either human beings or ani­mals, irre­spec­tive of oth­er uses to which such com­modi­ties or prod­ucts may be put, at all stages of pro­cess­ing from the raw com­mod­i­ty to the prod­ucts there­of in vendible form for human or ani­mal con­sump­tion. “Food resources” also means potable water pack­aged in com­mer­cial­ly mar­ketable con­tain­ers, all starch­es, sug­ars, veg­etable and ani­mal or marine fats and oils, seed, cot­ton, hemp, and flax fiber, but does not mean any such mate­r­i­al after it los­es its iden­ti­ty as an agri­cul­tur­al com­mod­i­ty or agri­cul­tur­al prod­uct.
(f) “Food resource facil­i­ties” means plants, machin­ery, vehi­cles (includ­ing on farm), and oth­er facil­i­ties required for the pro­duc­tion, pro­cess­ing, dis­tri­b­u­tion, and stor­age (includ­ing cold stor­age) of food resources, and for the domes­tic dis­tri­b­u­tion of farm equip­ment and fer­til­iz­er…”

NAFTA was mere­ly the open­ing artillery bom­bard­ment against the Amer­i­can farmer and the ulti­mate depop­u­la­tion of rur­al areas. The death of the Amer­i­can farmer will ulti­mate­ly come at the hands of EO 13603 and I believe this will be ful­ly imple­ment­ed when Oba­ma declares mar­tial law.


Thank God That I Do Not Live On a Farm”

Put this map into your GPS, it will tell where you soon cannot go. The UN’s manifestation of forcing people into stack and pack cities.

Put this map into your GPS, it will tell where you soon can­not go. The UN’s man­i­fes­ta­tion of forc­ing peo­ple into stack and pack cities.

Do you think that you and your fam­i­ly are actu­al­ly safe from the rav­ages of depop­u­lat­ing the rur­al areas through eco­nom­ic black­mail and ulti­mate star­va­tion? Think again! Unless you present­ly live in the core inner city and occu­py less than 500 square feet of liv­ing space, the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion, as I write these words, is active­ly plot­ting to get you out of your home and into dense­ly pop­u­lat­ed urban areas and this will be ful­ly exposed in Part Four of this series as the dra­con­ian con­cept of megac­i­ties is ful­ly explored.