Larimer County, Colorado Agenda 21 Advocates “Steal” Protestor’s Child

I have been work­ing to bring jus­tice to the Stacy Lynne child abduc­tion case for some time now. It has become cru­sade with me but for no other rea­son than I am a par­ent who would be totally dev­as­tated if my child was stolen from my cus­tody because of my polit­i­cal activ­i­ties against the inva­sion of Agenda 21 into my com­mu­nity. This mom, with no alle­ga­tions of wrong­do­ing, has lost her son in retal­i­a­tion for fight­ing for her com­mu­nity. This could hap­pen to any­one of us. Please help me spread the word and make this story go viral. The cor­rupt legal forces in Larimer County, Col­orado are show­ing signs of buck­ling just as they were ready to keep Stacy from see­ing her son, per­ma­nently. For what they do to one of us, they do to all of us. Thanks for help­ing and God Bless all of you.
–Dave Hodges

Larimer County, Col­orado Agenda 21 Advo­cates “Steal” Protestor’s Child
by Dave Hodges
The Com­mon Sense Show
Sep­tem­ber 28, 2012

Bad things hap­pen when Agenda 21/ICLEI advo­cates come to your home­town. Most aware peo­ple know that the Agenda 21 advo­cates are ded­i­cated to the demise of the fam­ily and in Larimer County, Col­orado, this phi­los­o­phy is being lived out. There­fore, should it be any sur­prise that when fully imple­mented, ICLEI reg­u­la­tions will not only severely limit access to elec­tric­ity and trans­porta­tion, deny the com­mon cit­i­zenry non­in­va­sive access to beau­ti­ful wilder­ness areas, destroy pri­vate busi­ness, impose unsus­tain­able tax rates, will arbi­trar­ily seize pri­vate prop­erty for per­sonal gain, will pro­mote cor­rup­tion at the high­est lev­els of indus­try and gov­ern­ment, have endorsed and imple­mented extreme pop­u­la­tion reduc­tion meth­ods and now ICLEI advo­cates have added child theft to their list of heinous crimes against human­ity which is per­pe­trated against those who would dare to oppose the fas­cist, anti-humanity policies.

For the past four years, Stacy Lynne of Larimer County (Ft. Collins), Col­orado, through a series of pub­lic pre­sen­ta­tions, has been des­per­ately alert­ing her com­mu­nity to the Agenda 21/ICLEI form of total­i­tar­i­an­ism which has been sys­tem­at­i­cally invad­ing her com­mu­nity for the past 17 years. Now, she finds her­self the vic­tim of polit­i­cal retal­i­a­tion in which her child has been stolen from her for dar­ing to reveal the truth.

As Stacy Lynne began mak­ing pub­lic pre­sen­ta­tions regard­ing the dan­gers of Agenda 21/ICLEI, she gar­nered much pub­lic sup­port. For exam­ple, Lynne opposed the insane plan of “the green­ing” of down­town Ft. Collins, CO. in which only “eco friendly cars” would be per­mit­ted to park in down­town park­ing spaces. Local busi­nesses esti­mated that each park­ing spot was worth $300,000 per year. This reck­less Agenda/ICLEI pro­posal would have bank­rupted sev­eral local small busi­ness own­ers. How­ever, Lynne was suc­cess­ful in har­ness­ing com­mu­nity oppo­si­tion and defeated the pro­posal. Lynne also fought against her local government’s attempt to only employ Waste Man­age­ment, a finan­cial con­trib­u­tor to ICLEI, which would have bank­rupted two locally owned trash busi­nesses.  Lynne was some­what suc­cess­ful in defeat­ing this mea­sure as well.

Despite her suc­cesses, Lynne was mak­ing very pow­er­ful ene­mies includ­ing the Col­orado “poster child” of Agenda 21/ICLEI, Pat Stryker, whose busi­ness inter­ests were inter­twined with a group of Agenda 21 engi­neers, The Bren­dle Group, as well as Waste Man­age­ment. This placed Lynne in the crosshairs of Stryker’s ICLEI allies, and they came after Lynne with a vengeance.

At this point, it is rel­e­vant to note that this is the same Pat Stryker who donated  $50,000 for Obama’s inau­gu­ra­tion and con­tributed another $87,000 for the event. Stryker also donated $35,800 to the Obama Vic­tory Fund. In return, Stryker’s Abound Solar Com­pany, in a sce­nario rem­i­nis­cent to the Solyn­dra solar scan­dal, in which Stryker’s Abound Solar Com­pany was touted by Pres­i­dent Obama and sub­se­quently the Depart­ment of Energy doled out 400 mil­lion dol­lars to Stryker’s energy love child only to have the com­pany go bank­rupt only months later. Stryker’s busi­ness inter­ests told the Depart­ment of Energy that the donated taxpayer’s money was pro­jected to cre­ate 1200 per­ma­nent jobs. Yet, as early as last March, Abound Solar had already laid off 280 employ­ees. And by this past sum­mer, only months after receiv­ing a mas­sive amount of tax­payer money, Abound Solar filed for bank­ruptcy. This was the type of cor­rup­tion and inep­ti­tude that Stacy Lynne was attempt­ing to fight against in Larimer County, and for dar­ing to exer­cise her right First Amend­ment pro­tected free speech rights, the Agenda 21 forces of her com­mu­nity turned her life upside down.

Over nine years ago, Stacy Lynne and Jeff Pap­pen­heim par­ented Jaden. Accord­ing to Lynne, the bio­log­i­cal father chose to not play a promi­nent role in his son’s life leav­ing the respon­si­bil­ity for rais­ing the child to his mother. Then, with­out warn­ing in Jan­u­ary of 2011, the bio­log­i­cal father filed a court action which sought the sole cus­tody of Jaden.

The tri­umvi­rate con­sist­ing of for­mer Col­orado Gov­er­nor Bill Rit­ter, Judge Julie Field and Pat Stryker’s ICLEI inter­ests, sub­se­quently became involved in a series of “amaz­ing coin­ci­dences”, which cul­mi­nated in the neu­tral­iza­tion of Stacy Lynne as their main ICLEI/Agenda 21 oppo­nent in the Fort Collins area. This neu­tral­iza­tion was accom­plished by the steal­ing of Lynne’s son in one of the biggest mis­car­riages of jus­tice ever wit­nessed in a fam­ily court. All three par­ties are inex­tri­ca­bly tied to ICLEI/Agenda 21 inter­ests. The con­flicts of inter­ests between Rit­ter, Field, Stryker inter­ests, and ulti­mately the 8th Dis­trict Court of Larimer County, in this case, are numer­ous and a mat­ter of pub­lic record. Briefly, Rit­ter appoints Field to the Bench of the 8th Dis­trict Court in Jan­u­ary of 2011 which was the same month as the cus­tody action filed by Pap­pen­heim. Stryker began a pro­fes­sional rela­tion­ship with Field in 1987 when her law firm rep­re­sented Stryker inter­ests. Upon leav­ing office in Jan­u­ary of 2011, and after hav­ing appointed the judge who will steal Lynne’s child, Rit­ter goes to work for Stryker inter­ests. The newly appointed Field sub­se­quently con­ducts a Kan­ga­roo court trial in which Stacy, not accused of any wrong­do­ing, has her child awarded to Pap­pen­heim with a 100% trans­fer of custody.

Adding insult to injury, Stacy Lynne and her fol­low­ers have for­mally alleged that Pap­pen­heim has not allowed Stacy to see Jaden, as pre­scribed by the court, in vio­la­tion of the court order. Judge Field has con­sis­tently refused to rule in this matter.

There are so many dis­turb­ing aspects of this case that it is hard to know where to begin.  How­ever, the issue related to the bla­tant con­flicts of inter­ests which have served to under­mine the integrity of the Larimer County Court sys­tem seems like a pru­dent place to begin. There­fore, the doc­u­men­ta­tion used to sup­port the above­men­tioned alle­ga­tions against Rit­ter, Stryker and Fields, is listed below.

On Decem­ber 21, 2011, Stacy’s son was removed from her cus­tody by Field with­out any expla­na­tion and with­out any evi­dence pre­sented which proved Lynne was guilty of neglect, abuse or any other parental mis­be­hav­ior that would war­rant such an action by any court. In the trial, Field refused to allow Lynne to call wit­nesses on her behalf and when the cit­i­zens in the court gasped with amaze­ment, Field cleared the court­room so this mis­car­riage of jus­tice could con­tinue away from the watch­ful eye of the pub­lic. Field’s cus­tody rul­ing allowed Stacy one super­vised visit, every two weeks, with Jaden at the Har­mony House, located in Fort Collins, where Pat Stryker’s Bohemian Foun­da­tion, in a direct con­flict of inter­est, is listed as a finan­cial con­trib­u­tor. In order to see her child at a super­vised visit, Lynne must pay hun­dreds of dol­lars to visit her child for two hours at the Har­mony House and this egre­gious con­flict of inter­est is ignored by the courts. In my days as a men­tal health coun­selor, I have seen more lenient parental rights granted to con­victed pedophiles!

Why would Field mis­use her judi­cial author­ity and judi­cially abuse a woman whose only “crime” was to oppose the insid­i­ous inva­sion of her com­mu­nity by ICLEI inter­ests? Sim­ple, Field is also an Agenda 21/ICLEI advo­cate as evi­denced by her employ­ment his­tory in which she claims on her judi­cial appli­ca­tion that she was a spe­cial con­sul­tant to the Inter­na­tional Mon­e­tary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, from Jan­u­ary 2007-December 2009. “Both are insti­tu­tions in the United Nations sys­tem” and are behold­ing to Agenda 21/ICLEI inter­ests. So not only was Lynne a polit­i­cal oppo­nent of Stryker inter­ests because of her anti-Agenda 21/ICLEI stance, Field was also an Agenda 21/ICLEI foe of Lynne as well. If Field had an ounce of judi­cial integrity, she would have recused her­self from the case. How­ever, it also appears that Field had her own finan­cial inter­est to pro­tect. Judge Field was serv­ing as both an Attor­ney Medi­a­tor and board mem­ber for the Cross­roads Safe­house, a refuge for neglected chil­dren and bat­tered women. Accord­ing to the Cross­roads web­site, the Bren­dle Group is a major con­trib­u­tor to the their insti­tu­tion and is also con­nected to Stryker busi­ness inter­ests. The Bren­dle Group is a self-admitted col­lec­tion of “Agenda 21 engi­neers” who are a dri­ving force behind the Agenda 21/ICLEI projects in Larimer County and across the nation. Judge Field badly needs to explain this bla­tant con­flict of interest.

Field’s con­flicts of inter­ests are not lim­ited to her ICLEI inter­ests; On page one of Field’s Judi­cial appli­ca­tion for the 8th Judi­cial Dis­trict, she lists her work address as 123 N. Col­lege Avenue, Suite 200, Ft. Collins, Col­orado. West Moun­tain Asset Man­age­ment, a Pat Stryker com­pany, shows the same address on Fed­eral Cor­po­rate Fil­ings and web­sites, for the same time period. This means that the good Judge was a suit­e­m­ate of Pat Stryker and since Stacy Lynne was a polit­i­cal oppo­nent of Field’s good friend, this judge should have had the integrity to not pre­side over this judi­cial travesty.

Just when the con­flicts of inter­est could not get any worse, The Com­mon Sense Show staff dis­cov­ered Fields’ bla­tant dis­re­gard for the need to demon­strate judi­cial impar­tial­ity is fur­ther evi­denced by the fact that from July 1987 to July 1989, Julie Field worked as a lit­i­ga­tion asso­ciate with the Nut­ter, McLen­nen & Fish, a Boston law firm. The same law firm rep­re­sented Stryker Biotech, a sub­sidiary of Stryker Cor­po­ra­tion, in a felony trial in the U.S. Dis­trict Court of Mass­a­chu­setts (United States of Amer­ica v. Stryker Biotech, LLC, et al., No. 1:09-cr-10330, D. Mass.).  

What are the odds that a long-time Stryker ally would become the judge of record of in the Lynne divorce action? Field was appointed to the 8th Dis­trict by out­go­ing Col­orado Gov­er­nor Bill Rit­ter, effec­tive Jan­u­ary 1, 2011. When Rit­ter left the Governor’s Office, his new $300,000 posi­tion was enti­tled “Direc­tor of the Cen­ter for the New Energy Econ­omy” at Col­orado State Uni­ver­sity. As reported by State Bill Col­orado , “CSU pro­vided a job descrip­tion for Ritter’s posi­tion, which is being financed for three years by foun­da­tions, includ­ing that belong­ing to medical-device heiress Patri­cia Stryker, a Fort Collins res­i­dent and a promi­nent player in Col­orado pol­i­tics”. The Den­ver Busi­ness Jour­nal also reported “Rit­ter said fund­ing for the cen­ter and his posi­tion will come from pri­vate sources: the San Francisco-based Energy Foun­da­tion; the Fort Collins-based Bohemian Foun­da­tion founded in 2001 by Fort Collins heiress and Demo­c­ra­tic Party sup­porter Pat Stryker; and other donors”. There­fore, Bill Rit­ter, the Gov­er­nor who appointed Julie Field to a judge­ship, now works for Stacy Lynne’s polit­i­cal oppo­nent, Pat Stryker, and the pub­lic is left to believe that this is all one great big set of coincidences.

Gov­er­nor Rit­ter also had an Agenda 21/ICLEI ax to grind against Lynne as Rit­ter is a board mem­ber with Energy Foun­da­tion of San Fran­cisco. In 2010– 2011 the Energy Foun­da­tion con­tributed $600,000 to ICLEI. Read­ers can view the run­ning list of  dona­tions to ICLEI here.

It is impor­tant to men­tion, at this point, that the entire legal appa­ra­tus and polit­i­cal sys­tem in Fort Collins, Col­orado, is fully vested in the Agenda 21 poli­cies of ICLEI as evi­denced by the removal of Jaden which was the first of a series of heinous and harass­ing actions per­pe­trated by the offi­cials located in Fort Collins (Larimer County), Col­orado against Stacy Lynne for her polit­i­cal advo­cacy against Agenda 21.

Imme­di­ately fol­low­ing the trial in which Jaden was removed from his mother’s cus­tody, Lynne went to a nearby Kinkos/FEDEX to type an injunc­tion against Field’s cus­tody order. Shortly there­after, Lynne was arrested by Larimer County Sher­iffs on kid­nap­ping charges and attempted crim­i­nal flight with a child even though Jaden was not in her care at the time. When the deputies were asked to pro­duce the arrest war­rant and the court order to trans­fer cus­tody of Jaden, these law enforce­ment offi­cials replied they did not have to pro­duce either doc­u­ment prior to arrest­ing Lynne (vio­la­tion of CRS 16–3-02). Lynne was denied a sub­se­quent Con­tempt Hear­ing, nor was she was arrested with prob­a­ble cause (vio­la­tion of CRS 16–3-108). Yet, when Lynne appeared in court fol­low­ing her release, the Larimer County Dis­trict Attorney’s Office stated that no charges were being pre­ferred. If there ever was a case for false impris­on­ment, this is the text book case. Lynne is suing Larimer County for these and other alleged vio­la­tions against Larimer County Sheriff’s.

Cour­tesy of the Larimer County Sheriff’s brazen dis­re­gard for the con­sti­tu­tional rights of its cit­i­zens, Stacy Lynne has also become the vic­tim of an ille­gal wire tap of her cell phone AFTER the loss of her son to Pap­pen­heim. In addi­tion, Stacy Lynne dis­cov­ered a Larimer County Sher­iffs track­ing device attached to her SUV on May 3, 2012. The device was con­firmed as a track­ing device by nearby the Weld County Sheriff’s office as belong­ing to Larimer County Sher­iffs. The device was sub­se­quently removed by Weld County offi­cials and returned to Larimer County offi­cials. There is no court order which legally jus­ti­fies the instal­la­tion and use of such a sur­veil­lance device on Stacy Lynne’s vehi­cle. This makes no sense, unless the Larimer County Sher­iff Depart­ment is fear­ful that Lynne may have uncov­ered and will reveal even more crim­i­nal cor­rup­tion involv­ing the par­ties men­tioned in this arti­cle and that the infor­ma­tion may sub­se­quently be revealed to jour­nal­ists such as myself. For the life of me, I can­not imag­ine another set of moti­va­tions which could under­lie these repeated and rep­re­hen­si­ble vio­la­tions of the pub­lic trust and the peo­ple of Larimer County need to be ask­ing questions.

In com­plet­ing this clean sweep of judi­cial abuse, Field has ordered that Lynne pay 100% of Pappenheim’s $14,000 of attor­ney fees. Lynne is not employed and does not have the money and sub­se­quently faces a Con­tempt of Court action for which she will be sent to jail for 120 days if she fails to com­ply with the pay­ment order by Field. This rookie judge has rein­vented the medieval prac­tice of putting debtors in prison. Mean­while, Stacy has seen her son twice in nearly 5 months and her con­tempt actions filed with the court, related to this mat­ter have been ignored by this same judge.

On Sep­tem­ber 13, 2012, Stacy appeared in the kan­ga­roo court­room of Judge Julie Field where she faced the total ter­mi­na­tion of her parental rights as well as the enforce­ment of the order to pay $14,000 in legal fees. Stacy shared with me that she felt that it was entirely pos­si­ble that the she was going to be sent to jail and she also faced the pos­si­bil­ity of never see­ing her son again. How­ever, the judi­cial Gods inter­vened and Judge Field was not able to act upon these two issues on this par­tic­u­lar day. Accord­ing to sev­eral wit­nesses, Stacy attempted to read an open­ing state­ment and have it entered into the court record as she was attempt­ing to get on to the record the out­ra­geous judi­cial con­flicts of inter­est in this case. In a bla­tant vio­la­tion of Lynne’s due process rights, Judge Field would not per­mit Stacy to read her state­ment. There was an out­cry from the over­flow crowd in the court­room in which one man demanded that Judge Field respect Stacy’s legal right to present evi­dence on her behalf. The Judge had the pro­tes­tor removed from the court but his removal did not totally silence the buzz in the court­room. In a scene rem­i­nis­cent of the Key­stone Cops, the judge over­re­acted and pushed the emer­gency panic but­ton and quickly departed out the back­door of the court­room along with Pap­pen­heim and his attor­ney. Some wit­nesses reported that the chaos that ensued was both com­i­cal and fright­en­ing. Fort Collins police were dis­patched to the scene and entered the court house with guns drawn. Not every­one saw the offi­cers with guns drawn, but every­one that I spoke with thought it was quite com­i­cal that the both the judge and local law enforce­ment over­re­acted to a rel­a­tively benign situation.

As an inter­est­ing side note, I was told by a cou­ple of wit­nesses, at the lat­est judi­cial fiasco, that while they were being herded by local law enforce­ment into a com­mons area, they encoun­tered par­ents who, like Stacy Lynne, were unjustly hav­ing their parental right sev­ered as well. In fact, as I am dis­cov­er­ing from my inves­ti­ga­tion, that there exists suf­fi­cient evi­dence to inves­ti­gate both the entire CPS appa­ra­tus and the Larimer County Court sys­tem for judi­cial impro­pri­ety when it comes to the removal of chil­dren from their par­ents. Some local res­i­dents sus­pect a more sin­is­ter set of moti­va­tions which under­lies why Larimer County has such a high rate of child removals com­pared to other coun­ties its size. And given the actions of the Larimer County Sheriff’s, it seems rea­son­able to inves­ti­gate this law enforce­ment agency from top to bot­tom for cor­rup­tion. It is notable that at this point in time, there is a doc­u­men­tary crew as well as a cou­ple of well-known jour­nal­ists who have expressed inter­est in var­i­ous aspects of this case. It is also notable that this is the same legal appa­ra­tus who inten­tion­ally framed Tim­o­thy Mas­ters for mur­der by inten­tion­ally tam­per­ing with evi­dence. Master’s was even­tu­ally freed but not until he spent almost a decade in prison for a crime he did not commit.

It should also be noted that one of the rea­sons that Judge Field is con­sid­er­ing a motion to ter­mi­nate Lynne’s rights to vis­i­ta­tion with Jaden is because the boy is report­edly “fright­ened of his mother.” This begs the ques­tion, how does a boy who has seen his mother twice in five months, in a super­vised set­ting, in a pub­lic loca­tion, become afraid of his mother, a mother, who up until late Decem­ber of 2011, was the only cus­to­dial par­ent that this child had ever known? A fair judge and vir­tu­ous court sys­tem would be seek­ing alter­na­tive answers to this com­mon sense ques­tion. How­ever, there is noth­ing fair and vir­tu­ous about the legal sys­tem in the People’s Repub­lic of Larimer County.

At the end of the day, and set­ting aside all of the cor­rup­tion asso­ci­ated in this case, there is a les­son for all Amer­i­cans with regard to the court-sponsored Stacy Lynne child abduc­tion case. When well-meaning cit­i­zens stand up to the insid­i­ous forces of Agenda 21, bad things, very bad things can hap­pen to them and to their fam­i­lies. This abuse can only exist in a vac­uum of courage and knowl­edge. And any knowl­edge­able per­son knows that Agenda 21 seeks to under­mine the author­ity of the par­ent and seeks to destroy the fam­ily unit. If you are read­ing these words and you are hear­ing about Agenda 21 for the first time, you have an oblig­a­tion to human­ity, and for the wel­fare of your fam­ily, to edu­cate your­self and share what you have learned with igno­rant per­sons within your sphere of influence.

For Stacy and Jaden, this tragedy is the poster child case of the hor­ri­ble things that can hap­pen to peo­ple who dare to oppose the forces of ICLEI and Agenda 21. It is safe to say that if Stacy Lynne had not suc­cess­fully opposed the Agenda 21/ICLEI forces in Larimer County, Stacy would still be Jaden’s pri­mary cus­to­dial par­ent in the fall of 2012.

Amer­ica, you can­not let the Stacy Lynne case fade from the public’s atten­tion. For if this injus­tice is allowed to stand, then none of us are safe. Please help Stacy spread the word about this trav­esty of jus­tice by mak­ing this tragic writ­ten account go viral.

Stacy Lynne’s sup­port­ers have set up a legal relief fund and con­tri­bu­tions may be sent to: The Ben­e­fit of Stacy Lynne-P.O. Box 1211 Arvada, Co. 80001–1211.

““…cur­rent lifestyles and con­sump­tion pat­terns of the afflu­ent mid­dle class – involv­ing high meat intake use of fos­sil fuels, appli­ances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and sub­ur­ban hous­ing – are not sus­tain­able. A shift is nec­es­sary which will require a vast strength­en­ing of the mul­ti­lat­eral sys­tem, includ­ing the United Nations…”
–Mau­rice Strong: Open­ing speech at the 1992 UN Con­fer­ence on Envi­ron­ment and Development

““The world is a dan­ger­ous place to live; not because of the peo­ple who are evil, but because of the peo­ple who don’t do any­thing about it.”
–Albert Ein­stein

Source:  http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2012/09/28/larimer-county-co-agenda-21-advocates-steal-protestors-child/